Three Essays in Entrepreneurial Finance, Financial Intermediation, and FinTech

Abstract

My Ph.D. dissertation consists of three chapters focused on topics in entrepreneurial finance, financial intermediation, and FinTech. The first chapter analyzes the effects of bank competition on gender and racial gaps in entrepreneurship. By leveraging interstate bank deregulation from 1994 to 2021, I find that stronger bank competition increases the quantity and quality of banking services offered to minority borrowers. Developing a novel measure of discrimination using narrative information in the complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, I demonstrate that bank competition reduces discrimination, alleviating the financial constraints of female and minority entrepreneurs. Stronger bank competition also reduces gender and racial gaps in firm performance and business equity accumulation, promoting wealth equality and fostering equitable economic growth.The second chapter draws on the context of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) publicly disclosing consumer complaint narratives in 2015. Utilizing a difference-in-differences design, I find that, following disclosure, CFPB-supervised banks whose complaint narratives are disclosed are less prone to discriminate against minority borrowers in the mortgage lending market. This reduces racial disparities in interest rates, default rates, and rejection rates. The disclosure saves minority borrowers $102 million in interest payments and aids over 14,000 minority households in securing loans annually, thereby narrowing the racial gap in homeownership. Stakeholders including consumers, peer banks, and stock market investors facilitate the disclosure's effects on reducing discrimination. The third chapter, co-authored with Bibo Liu and Xuan Tian, studies how policy uncertainty affects household credit access. Using crowdfunding data from a major peer-to-peer (P2P) crowdfunding platform, Prosper.com, and a news-based policy uncertainty index developed by Baker, Bloom, and Davis (2016), we find that policy uncertainty negatively affects households’ access to small loans. Using an instrument variable based on partisan conflicts and a difference-in-differences analysis relying on plausibly exogenous variation in policy uncertainty generated by gubernatorial elections, we show that the relation is likely causal. Investors’ increased caution on deal selection and enhanced value of the “wait-and-see” option appear to be two plausible underlying channels through which policy uncertainty affects P2P crowdfunding. Further evidence suggests that policy uncertainty decreases households’ incentives to borrow at the aggregate level, and increases loan interest rates and default probabilities.